I think these issues should be discussed at panthic level by top scholars of the panth, I feel that discussing such issues on forum will only lead to confusion and useless arguments. I do not know the stance of Samprada's or Taksal on this issue. It is the point of debate among scholars whether the Dasam Granth is entirely or partially written by Sri Guru Gobind Singh Ji or It is not written by Guru Gobind Singh. However Gursikhs that believe Ragmala is the bhog of sri Guru Granth Sahib ji will be more more open minded on this issue. Sri Dasam Granth is a Granth known as 'Daswein Padshah Ka Granth' in old history references. Gursikhs that believe that sri Guru Granth Sahib ji ends at Mundavani will not accept banis afer this. One thing that stands out is that these banis are in the majority of cases after sri Mundavani you can check this by looking at saroops on Panjab Digital Library website. There was a gathering of the panth before saroops of Guru Granth Sahib ji were published and it was decided that these banis were not authentic and they were omitted. So it is more difficult to do the required research. Another problem is that many puratan saroops were stolen or shaheed during operation bluestar. In any case more research is required in this field. If these bani's were authentic surely they would have been added before sri Mundavani. Guru Tegh Bahadur ji's bani was added before sri Mundavani. In the kartarpuri bir these additional bani's appear after sri Mundavani.In my opinion these bani's are not part of sri Guru Granth Sahib ji.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |